<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan Conley &#187; Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danconley.net/category/accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danconley.net</link>
	<description>He&#039;s just zis guy, you know?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Browser rage</title>
		<link>http://www.danconley.net/2007/10/browser-rage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danconley.net/2007/10/browser-rage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML/CSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danconley.net/index.php/2007/10/22/browser-rage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t been doing as much web design as I&#8217;d like to recently, mostly because my job has been more focused on the librarianly side of things than on the geeky side. I&#8217;m working on a new conference subsite, though, and as such rediscovered my hatred of Internet Explorer. IE6 was absolutely atrocious, standards-wise. There [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been doing as much web design as I&#8217;d like to recently, mostly because my job has been more focused on the librarianly side of things than on the geeky side. I&#8217;m working on a new conference subsite, though, and as such rediscovered my hatred of Internet Explorer.</p>
<p><abbr title="Internet Explorer 6">IE6</abbr> was absolutely atrocious, standards-wise. There are (as I&#8217;ve already said once today) entire sites out there devoted to telling coders how to fix its mistakes. I haven&#8217;t used <abbr title="Internet Explorer 7">IE7</abbr> very much, mostly because I haven&#8217;t needed to see how things look in different browsers for a while, but I do know that they had the opportunity to fix a lot of the <abbr title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</abbr> problems in <abbr title="Internet Explorer 6">IE6</abbr> but instead left them in and just removed the <a title="fix" href="http://www.danconley.net/index.php/2006/02/25/internet-explorer-and-the-great-beyond/">fix</a> for them. Thanks guys, much obliged.</p>
<p>My specific complain this time stems from the lack of pseudoclass recognition. For accessibility reasons, menus on sites should be unordered lists that you style to look nice: it&#8217;s how it&#8217;s done both on the <a title="main Center for International Rehabilitation Research Information and Exchange site" href="http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/">main <abbr title="Center for International Rehabilitation Research Information and Exchange">CIRRIE</abbr> site</a> and on the <a title="other conference site I coded" href="http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/icf/conference/">other conference site I&#8217;ve coded</a> (though the latter is more obviously a list). Using display:inline you can also have a navbar at the top, like on my <a title="Baby Names project" href="http://danconley.net/babynames/">Baby Names project</a>.</p>
<p>The problem is that adding brackets around each item <em>looks</em> nice but disrupts the natural flow of the words. It&#8217;s become my standard method but only because<br />
the real way &#8212; #menu ul li:before {content:&#8221;["} #menu ul li:after {content:"]&#8220;} &#8212; doesn&#8217;t work in either modern version of Internet Explorer.</p>
<p>This was a rant, though not a particularly eloquent or timely one. It&#8217;s just damn frustrating when the developers of the most used browser seem insistent on ignoring the rules. (As an aside, the earlier blog post I linked to was <em>also</em> complaining about pseudoclasses; heh)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danconley.net/2007/10/browser-rage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note to NGOs</title>
		<link>http://www.danconley.net/2006/04/note-to-ngos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danconley.net/2006/04/note-to-ngos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danconley.net/index.php/2006/04/10/note-to-ngos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is it that nowhere on your website do you actually explain what your acronym stands for? You apparently haven&#8217;t told anyone else on the internet, either. I mean, I&#8217;m as big a fan of being esoteric as the next guy, but seriously. At first I thought it was an isolated thing, but an awful [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that nowhere on your website do you actually explain what your acronym stands for? You apparently haven&#8217;t told anyone else on the internet, either. I mean, I&#8217;m as big a fan of being esoteric as the next guy, but seriously.</p>
<p>At first I thought it was an isolated thing, but an awful lot of groups out there seem content to make up a few letters and forget what they stand for (not that any library associations are <a href="http://www.sla.org" title="Special Libraries Association">guilty of that</a>, mind you).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danconley.net/2006/04/note-to-ngos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
